Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Berlin (lawyer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Berlin (lawyer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Sources are either unreliable, not independent, or provide significant coverage. GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, United States of America, and California. GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability, notwithstanding the "Top 100 Trial Lawyers" and "Super Lawyer" pseudo-awards. TJRC (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. The creating editor makes nothing edits here and there, then lo and behold, they create the page in one foul swoop. Make a few more edits that day and that's that. Smells of WP:PAID. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaskedSinger (talk • contribs) 05:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.