Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Barr (radio presenter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 23:58, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Barr (radio presenter)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The eferences for the notability of this local radio announcer are essentially press releases; the award too is only local. DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The references given for the notability reference newspapers, the site of the WAAMI awards - the local radio announcer is local and therefore wins (numerous) local awards and even presents at them - would the same not be considered true of a New York City award-winning radio announcer? With all due respect, is there a problem with the state of Western Australia awarding their own broadcasting awards to their own presenters and local broadcast award-winners being recognised? tokenskeptic ( talk ) 19:33 29 September 2014 (UTC)

how far down would you carry this? I think its well established that awards at less than the national level do not generally count for notability. (And yes, I'd apply this in NYC also, unless the announcer is carried on a major network outside the city.) DGG ( talk ) 15:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The search keywords for "Peter Barr Australia" in Google does not retrieve much results. - Vatsan34 (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete probable AUTOBIO as primarily worked on as a single purpose editor. The sources merely confirm biographical details. The award he won is not a significant award in Australian radio industry. LibStar (talk) 15:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.