Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Arvanitis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Estia Health. Sandstein 08:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Arvanitis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Passing mentions. scope_creep^Talk 11:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The articles linked as citations make more than passing mentions. In particular, the Sydney morning herald article for citation #2, and citation #1; have Peter Arvanatis as the primary focus of the article Jack4576 (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't therefore think that this article fails the WP:BIO criteria. Please take a look at the articles cited throughout the article to see that Peter is mentioned more than merely in passing. Jack4576 (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - In cite #1/#2 Peter's lifestyle is mentioned in contrast to the conditions of the nursing homes, not because he stands as an independent subject. A quick google search finds a few articles about his home [1][2] (all based on the same original vogue photoshoot) and a couple of 2019 business articles [3][4] but they're still primarily about companies/sales not the person.... I don't think it's enough --Spacepine (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

part of the story within those articles, is Avanitis' lifestyle as the former owner & controlling shareholder of those companies. Peter doesn't actually own those companies, or run them anymore; but articles are being written because of his newsworthy lifestyle juxtaposed with nursing home neglect Jack4576 (talk) 11:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I see it as newsworthy neglect juxtaposed with questionably noteworthy lifestyle gossip. --Spacepine (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Estia Health as an alternative to deletion. The sources are mainly about the company he founded, not him. Deus et lex (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Estia Health WP:ATD per WP:CHEAP Wm335td (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.