Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peski Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peski Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a small record company venture, it was simply a list of bands and singers on its label (with a 'notability' template), until a COI editor wrote the entire article based on primary sources in 2015. I can find mentions online. such as "released on Cardiff-based Peski Records" but no other in-depth, independent and reliable sources (in English or Welsh) about this company. Considering it was set up and has been operating during the internet age, it would strongly suggest it fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP (considering it went out of business in 2016 I'm wondering whether the company are using Wikipedia as an archive history) Sionk (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .Now there are several record companies not clear how this particular one is notable.Further it got closed in 2016.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:ORGCRIT: no "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources" - while notability is not inherited from the acts they have recorded (WP:INHERITORG), it could be said that in recording these acts they have had a significant effect on culture and entertainment, per WP:ORGSIG, but without the "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization" required by WP:ORGDEPTH, the article fails notability; therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.