Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persil abaya shampoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Henkel. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Persil abaya shampoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable brand. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:39, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence that this is any more than a run-of-the-mill product. AllyD (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this article is to remain in Wikipedia, more information needs to be provided. I did a fairly involved internet search and found very little outside of the product's adverttisements, social media or its website. It seems an interesting product, but more is needed about it, such as independent evaluations and news stories. Maybe a short mention of it in the article for the company that makes it would be in order. Bill Pollard (talk) 11:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Henkel, the manufacturer. These consumer products might have some kind of cultural, historical, or technical significance, and given that they're marketed in Saudi Arabia sources for that may not be in the Latin alphabet. But this just says that it's detergent for sale. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is a redir needed or is the super-duper WP search engine good enough? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Henkel. I agree with some arguments above.--Soroboro (talk) 02:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But if it is redirected wouldn't we have to add something about the product in the target article? And if we did would that not introduce a bit of a bias toward a minor product? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think it is reasonable to put one sentence about this product in the Henkel article, making a redirect work as it is meant to work. This product is unique enough to be mentioned. And I am uncertain whether this is a minor product. We do not have sales figures. Bill Pollard (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Henkel Company pages often list their products such as Pfizer and Zoetis. Mkdw ^talk 04:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.