Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Glasser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perry Glasser[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DOesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is written by the subject himself so I’m going to presume he’s given it his best shot and what we have here is the best sources available. Of the six sources, the first three are deadlinks, the fourth a review on Booklist (not sure how useful that is for notability), the fifth is a Kirkus review, and the sixth confirms the subject is on the staff of the NAR. There are some unsourced claims of prize wins and I just deleted an entire section of unsourced material. For a career spanning nearly forty years this is very scant and does not indicate to me that the subject is notable. Mccapra (talk) 02:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.