Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanent Ability (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 23:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Permanent Ability[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Permanent Ability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no real notability shown for this promotional band article. the awards are not major. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. was kept at last afd due to two sources but one was a minor local limelight piece and the other was a piece where the band just talks about themselves on a site with no sign of being a reliable source [1]. nothing satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Chenzw Talk 05:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:Lacking in significant coverage in reliable sources, so the band does not pass WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The coverage in the Columbus dispatch is insubstantial, and the TastesLikeRock interview appears to be no longer online, but these two being the only source just doesn't make enough coverage for meeting notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.