Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peripera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peripera

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This brand lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, as required by WP:ORG. Random86 (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom, where's the sourcing? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete borderline speedy CSD-A7, pure promo and nothing more to say. Gaff (talk) 05:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:ORG not satisfied. Just because a notable band is shilling for it doesn't make it in and of itself notable. Notability is not inherited. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 01:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.