Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfectcompetition.net 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 20:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Perfectcompetition.net, round 2
[edit]It was deleted in April as too new. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfectcompetition.net. But the game has not grown: it's forum shows 2,778 members; 673 topics; 2,710 messages. Not notable.
- Delete Renata 07:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails to break the 2 million mark on Alexa, less than one post per member on the forum - not, I think notable per WP:WEB and little evidence of notability by any other criterion. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]
AfD? 17:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC) - Delete per JzG; these things are like the zombies in ... that zombie killin' game. House of the Dead. Yeah. RasputinAXP talk contribs 18:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per JzG --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 20:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per zat Guy. Latinus 20:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Why is Industryplayer notable and included? Have a look at their forums? They supposedly have 2386 posts and only 323 "active players". SL2006 02:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Probably because nobody had spotted it and nominated it for deletion yet. --kingboyk 16:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have just nominated it: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industryplayer Renata 19:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Probably because nobody had spotted it and nominated it for deletion yet. --kingboyk 16:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.