Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect manners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect manners[edit]

Unable to assertain any notability for the book per WP:BK. Although I can find a few reviews, they appear to be mainly booksellers, who I don't believe count as independent third party sources, with a few equine related publications. Since the author seems notable, I'd suggest a merge/redirect to the authors article would be preferable to a delete (though the article name should probably be capitalised). CultureDrone (talk) 07:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment article was originally prod at the beginning of June, but restored on request from the author CultureDrone (talk) 08:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. If references were provided to explain exactly how the book is notable, I may be inclined to change my mind. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 10:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very misleading article title! The article is actually about a book whose full title is Perfect Manners: How You Should Behave So Your Horse Does Too. All that aside, I agree that there's nothing to show that this book is considered notable even among horse owners. While it rates a mention in an article about horse training (such as Natural horsemanship), no reason that an article is necessary. With its current lack of content, it's advertising; adding more content risks a copyvio. Mention it somewhere, not here. Mandsford (talk) 12:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, and move if kept: the current title is somewhat misleading, in that Perfect Manners is not obviously about a book about horsemanship. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.