Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect as Cats
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect as Cats[edit]
- Perfect as Cats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: just added a few sources to show this tribute album has notability. I know many dont, but this one got pretty mainstream coverage for a tribute album, including in non-English newspapers.--Milowent • talkblp-r 04:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 00:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--nice save. Listed references show notability (I'm basing this on NME and the Pitchfork review alone, since I don't read French or Russian). Meelar (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Milowent's improvements. Nice work. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.