Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect (novel)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pretty Little Liars. ~ mazca talk 21:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect (novel)[edit]
- Perfect (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This derivative stub is a redundant spin-off of Pretty Little Liars, a relatively short article which already covers the series. Its author has created six stubs for related novels which include only plot information, and has yet to expand this article significantly with real-world coverage to assert notability (and seems unlikely to). She has reverted my attempts to boldly redirect, so I'm seeking a consensus on merging/redirecting or deletion. — TAnthonyTalk 18:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge indeed, since delete is not an option for me (the title is a viable search term). I don't see any potential for this acquiring content. A few hits here do not add up to any kind of significant coverage. Drmies (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @890 · 20:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- merge fairly obvious merge. Not all the content, but perhaps abbreviated to one half,supplemented with information about the production and the reception of the book. The summaries in the main article are disgracefully insufficient, but there;s a middle ground. This is one time a group nomination could have helped. DGG (talk) 08:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.