Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perdita Hyde-Sinclair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 03:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perdita Hyde-Sinclair

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only three sources, two of which comes from the same source. Nothing else found via WP:BEFORE except a couple of passing mentions. May I suggest a redirect to List of Emmerdale characters (2006) as an WP:ATD. (Oinkers42) (talk) 06:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 06:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 06:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep per WP:HEY, as this article has been greatly improved since the nomination, and likely will be improved even more. The character is clearly notable and has SIGCOV and the 27+ sources show that. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article has been improved since the nomination. I disagree that there was not enough sources elsewhere online as I could find numerous. It looks like they are being added to the article. No need to redirect to List of Emmerdale characters (2006) since the article passes GNG and has SIGCOV in offline print sources.Rain the 1 18:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per improvements made to article post-nomination. – Meena • 14:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've had a go at improving the article and believe it passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. There are a number of sources out there for the character, but I will concede that it does take someone with knowledge of the subject to find them all. I do wish that a discussion had taken place on a relevant talk page, before coming straight to WP:AfD though. Also, I'm not quite sure what's wrong with refs coming from the same source? - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.