Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percy Jackson Book 6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Not-delete. There is no consensus on whether to merge, redirect, or neither, but there is a consensus against deletion. It is open to an editor believing merging or redirection to be an appropriate course of action to boldly do either, or to open a talk page discussion of same. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Jackson Book 6

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD : speculative article. Violates WP:CRYSTAL Codf1977 (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think this article shouldnt be deleted. It has refrences and some detail. I think that it also shouldnt be deleted as the release is only half a year away and it has been confirmed and everything -Tommader- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommader (talk • contribs) 16:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Camp Half-Blood, Book One as per this Amazon link and rewrite for encyclopedic tone. This title does not seem accurate, but is a reasonable search term. LadyofShalott 18:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This Article is now called Camp Half Blood Book one all the details is confirmed and has no reason to be deleted - Tommader - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommader (talk • contribs) 17:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hold on a - Not sure that a book store is a WP:RS for a book release date Codf1977 (talk) 17:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Percy Jackson & the Olympians#Sequel until a title has been announced and confirmed. Possibly save information as subpage, or incorporate into Percy Jackson & the Olympians. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Percy Jackson & the Olympians#Sequel. The information is useful, but this does seem a bit early to make the article. —Air plane man— 22:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article shouldnt be deleted because it has some good information and although it may seem too early to make an article I think it is time soon. Monopoly44 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monopoly44 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC) — Monopoly44 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep because this article has good information and is very clear and clean. It has no Graffittii!!! Which is very good. FeelDaBuzz —Preceding unsigned comment added by FeelDaBuzz (talk • contribs) 17:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC) — FeelDaBuzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Note – SPA-tags re-added. –MuZemike 18:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Percy Jackson & the Olympians#Sequel per WP:CRYSTAL. BTW, it reads like fan article.--mono 00:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Percy Jackson & the Olympians#Sequel until a title has been announced and confirmed. I second PrincessofLlyr and Airplaneman. It's too early for this page to appear. -Mktsay123 (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)#[reply]
Comment - as the nom, I support what looks like the consensus view of Merge and #Redirect to Percy Jackson & the Olympians#Sequel. Codf1977 (talk) 08:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.