Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perceived crowding and shopping outcome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perceived crowding and shopping outcome[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay / original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:27, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a journal. --CutOffTies (talk) 09:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - no context of what this is really about or why it is notable/encyclopedic. WP is not a webhost. —Мандичка^YO 😜 11:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've declined a speedy A1 as the article is far from short, and does have context relevant to the title. However, it looks like an essay or dissertation and is not encyclopaedic. Peridon (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.