Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pep/7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 00:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pep/7[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. This has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years, and as far as I can see, this is not neglect but lack of notability. Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found a couple of references suggesting that it did actually exist so it is WP:V verifiable. But I don't see where it gained traction or notability. Fails WP:GNG for the computer related subject. Not that that is a similar usage Pep - 7 in non computing subjects that may or may not be notable. The article and incoming links are all computer related. Jeepday (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.