Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Institute of Management Studies, Munnad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as this seems clear enough and continuing it is unlikely to clarify any better, it's worth noting that degree-awarding schools are notable (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

People Institute of Management Studies, Munnad[edit]

People Institute of Management Studies, Munnad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable private college. Article is purely promotional, created by someone with a COI. Harry Let us have speaks 08:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The above is by the article's creator. The link provided does not mention Kannur University. Even if it did, this Institute is not notable and the article appears to have been created simply to promote a commercial organisation. Wikipedia is not a directory of organisations. Harry Let us have speaks 09:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kannur University doesn't give the name of the university in it's sub pages. It is strange. --Prof TPMS (talk) 09:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It appears that we are dealing with: "Departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field." It is being claimed that this is a department of Kannur University and there is no indication that it has made any significant contributions in its field. What we have is a bare bones directory entry which at the very least should be merged with the University's article. Harry Let us have speaks 19:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @AusLondonder, please review your !vote, as the consensus you are citing does not appear to apply to this page, per Harry's comment above. Thanks. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 18:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Kannur University. I found no significant coverage in reliable sources. Appears to be a non-notable subunit or department of a university. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 18:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clarification from the author: Kannur University has its own departments in different parts of Kannur and Kasaragod. In addition, they also have affiliated colleges in these areas. People Institute of Management Studies, Munnad is a duly affiliated college of Kannur University and the fact is clearly mentioned in the website of the University which is given as a reference in the page. The college is certainly new but not very new:it is already six years old. It is a very notable organization because it is an MBA college and the infrastructure requirements and other conditions for MBA colleges is quite extensive in the Kannur University jurisdiction, as far as I can understand.
  • Keep as a degree-awarding institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. In India there are thousands of colleges affiliated to large universities; these are, however, independent institutions, not sub-units of those universities. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. This is an independent college, NOT a sub-unit or a department of Kannur University. Vipinhari || talk 17:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please make arguments based on guidelines and policies, rather than outcomes.  Sandstein  19:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Outcomes reflect consensus. And consensus drives AfD. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  19:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.