Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeopleImages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PeopleImages

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Also advertorial fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate web page, nor is it a platform for advertising. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c)  21:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. At most, I would not oppose redirecting to Yuri Arcurs. gongshow talk 03:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.