Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentamnemonic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pentamnemonic[edit]

This appears to be a non-notable neologism. I could not find any references to the term in Google. Tim Pierce 19:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable and/or original research. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 23:28Z

Sorry-new to Wikipedia and should have read the qualifications more carefuly. If I knew how to delete this entry myself I would.

Delete per Quarl. In fact, speedy delete as author request. Stifle 01:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.