Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Toland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Penny Toland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NPOL, and the content may have BLP issues. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:BLP1E: sources in gNews search confined to that recent run for office and campaign-related perjury.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Single event, not news, too soon. Perhaps this could be merged later when the outcome is known on the whole event about all involved, etc. into an article about the "Belcarra inquiry" two thirds of which this article is about, and hence providing the (insufficient) notability for this subject, but there is no such article. Also, notability is not inherited. Aoziwe (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON / WP:BLP1E. She's probably not far off from being notable, but I don't think she is at the moment by the coverage I see coupled with BLPCRIME concerns.Icewhiz (talk) 07:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per WP:PERP, if a person was not already notable enough for an article for preexisting reasons, then we do not create an article on the basis of a criminal allegation which the subject has not yet been found guilty of. And even if she is found guilty in the end, it's still far from clear that she would be notable enough to escape WP:BLP1E. It's not our role to participate in the public tarring and feathering of accused but not convicted criminals who weren't already notable prior to the criminal charges. Bearcat (talk) 22:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This wiki article seems to have been created and written in bad faith to smear a single person, even before the results of the investigation surrounding her have concluded. SunChaser (talk) 08:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unacceptable attack article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.