Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Military Reserve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Military Reserve[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inactive and, to be honest, non-notable militia organization. I've searched high and low, but this was the best source I could find on the group. They're defunct now regardless. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Exact membership numbers are difficult to determine, the PAGRF may number anywhere from a few dozen to a few hundred dues paying members, concentrated largely in the suburban counties surrounding Philadelphia. " lolololol Reywas92^Talk 21:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:ADMASK. This is really just a promotional article... ==BonkHindrance (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think this is nowhere near as organized as units like Georgia State Defense Force--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 22:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like a small-time militia that wants to be more important. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.