Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennin Manathai Thottu
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wizardman 03:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pennin Manathai Thottu[edit]
- Pennin Manathai Thottu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reason for nomination unknown; completing incomplete AfD. --Geniac (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep I'm guessing the reason was notability and or lack of references. The references definitely need to be provided to show what makes the movie notable but, that is more an issue of cleanup. Article also desperately needs expansion and for editors not to remove validly placed tags. Perhaps the editor who removed the original reference tag would donate some time to providing said references and negate the need for said tag. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable film, lack of third-party reviews, and I cannot find even a credible source discussing what is the release date. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Considering the review found by PC78, vote changed to keep, though weak because I'm unsure of the film notability outside the Tamil community. --PeaceNT (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IRK!Leave me a note or two 15:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 22:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 22:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Plenty of google hits, and I've managed to find a review [1]. The article is ridiculously short, but I'm prepared to give it the benfit of the doubt. PC78 (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.