Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn Sylvan Health Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 13:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Penn Sylvan Health Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a nudist camp, not making any strong claim to passing our notability standards for organizations. This essentially just states that the camp exists, without making any particularly strong claim that its existence warrants the attention of an encyclopedia, and it's referenced to a single article in the local newspaper, which is not enough coverage to singlehandedly get the topic over WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH all by itself. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write something more substantial and better sourced than this, but just single-sourcing its existence is not enough. Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It should be noted that the camp seems to be called "PSHS Inc." nowadays, as indicated by the article's sole source. However, searching for that term does not result in any additional sources to be found either. And a single one, reliable as may be, is not enough to establish notability. --LordPeterII (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully the last relist. Please try to come to consensus in the next 7 days!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr. Universe (talk) 21:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.