Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penguin (gay slang)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Penguin (gay slang) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A slang word. Fails verifiability - only referenced to a TV show review which doesn't actually mention the word. (For what it's worth, Dictionary.com doesn't list this meaning of the word; the closest it lists is: "An actor who wears a tuxedo as part of a crowd scene".) Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I could be wrong but, without having seen the series, I have a feeling that the character could have been called a "penguin" on account of strutting around in finery—was he wearing a tuxedo at the time? I ask because, if so, that's an age-old use of the word. I don't see any support for this online. Largoplazo (talk) 11:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete no coverage in reliable secondary sources as far as I can tell. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The cited source does not contain the term, nor suggest that it spread any slang terms. I couldn't find reliable sources. Cnilep (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.