Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelodiscus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Punkmorten 11:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Soft Shelled Turtle, Wattle Necked Soft Shelled[edit]

No opinion. I caught both of these on CSD and rescued them. I'm not sure if they're notable within the animal world, but I figured it at least deserved some input. Ral315 (talk) 03:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I have a soft spot for taxonomy, so as long as it has the template filled out I'm fine with them. No animal article should ever be deleted IMO. --SeizureDog 03:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SeizureDog. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 03:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I nominated it for speedy deletion - at the time the whole content was like four words. They have been improved greatly, and I see no reason to delete it. -zappa.jak e (talk) 04:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- although they are stubby, the animals must be of some interest.--Peta 04:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep they're real animals, so they can have an article. —M e ts501^talk 07:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all real animals are notable, expand the article. --Ter e nc e Ong 08:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all genuine species are notable. Ace of Sevens 08:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Coredesat 09:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.