Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peeter Laud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peeter Laud

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably fails WP:SIGCOV Estopedist1 (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Estonia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG, nothing to indicate a passing of notability guildeines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO, lacking significant indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Doesn't appear to be notable enough to have a Wiki article. ExRat (talk) 08:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.