Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peeled and Quartered

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peeled and Quartered[edit]

Peeled and Quartered (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book by red link author. The only source is a dead link. SL93 (talk) 09:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  09:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  13:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No review or significant coverage found, fails WP:NBOOK. Hzh (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Resorts to namedropping James and the Giant Peach and A Clockwork Orange in a failed attempt to appear notable. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 17:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.