Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Alborna Soler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Alborna Soler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even if sources are found, I do not think being the first chiropractor in spain is a sufficient claim to notability. I notice there is no article on him in the Spanish WP. DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is almost completely WP:OR about an unnotable person. — fcsuper^{(How's That?, That's How!)} _{(Exclusionistic Immediatist )}— 06:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Without RS demonstrating notability, even being "the first" doesn't qualify one for inclusion here. Besides, an article about yourself is nothing to be proud of. Becoming a chiropractor isn't normally a notable event. Right now it's OR and promotion. If references can be found, then clean it up and keep it. Otherwise "the door's thataway ---->". -- Brangifer (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I very much doubt that the subject wrote this article about himself at the age of 120. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unverified and unsourced. Could not find anything on a search (granting that it would be hard to find anything considering the barriers of language and time). However I think calling it "promotion" is unwarranted, since he is certainly no longer practicing and most likely no longer alive (he graduated in 1917). --MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.