Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl of Peace EV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl of Peace EV[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Evidently non-notable "pet". Only source found is from the Daily Mail, which is obviously disregarded. The other one is a New Zealand blog post, both from 2013. PK650 (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think this "influential pet on social media" meets WP:GNG, and like humans, he does not acquire notability from having famous relatives. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG ^Atsme _Talk 📧 15:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I looked at this a couple of times, couldn't make up my mind, but now. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep^Talk 23:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.