Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Bay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Bay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since June 2009 and nominated for merger in November 2017, though there is little to be merged. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Practically no notability on its own, as a subject. -The Gnome (talk) 10:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure fiction-cruft, fails WP:NOTPLOT._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete/Redirect to SeaChange as it is the fictional setting of a 39 episode Australian Television show. Failing that, delete~~ --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, however, I would not be opposed to (weak) redirecting to SeaChange as it is the fictional setting of a 39 episode Australian Television show. I agree with the below that it is probably too generic, but still think it might have a possibility (maybe under a different title). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Name is a little too generic for a redirect methinks. Are there really no IRL places named this?_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as name is too generic for redirect. --Theredproject (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.