Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeaceTones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PeaceTones[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible advertising, no apparent significance. Should have been nominated for CSD, but using AFD to be safe. —- Randomness74 (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough coverage. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough RS here to substantiate WP:NOT. Deathlibrarian (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't find any reliable sources. Chabota Kanguya (talk) 05:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the author is just spamming for his business here, on the article about the business Virtual intellectual property organization, and at Richard Minsky. Cabayi (talk) 12:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pure un-encyclopedic advertising. They should also adopt terms better than the wishy-washy "empower" and "social change" but I digress... ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty obvious. It should have been deleted as G11 promotional. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV, apparent PROMO although it may merely be WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.