Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawan Yadav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Reading Beans (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Yadav

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't find this person notable. The article doesn't speak for itself. I previously moved the article to draftspace so that the creator can develop it undisturbed. They removed the AFC tag, moved it back to mainspace and pretended as if it was accepted via AFC. To avoid a move war, I am bringing it here. Citations also don't look reliable. In a nutshell, it fails WP:GNG Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and India. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please guide me for the this article from your end, [[1]] added multiple numbers of independent sources to improve this. --ServerCSS (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: You made the right call by coming to AfD after the draftification was contested. The subject passes WP:NPOL as an Indian state legislator. The sourcing is a little rough, but I don't see anything too bad to the point it warrants a WP:TNT (WP:DINC). Curbon7 (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the article should be moved to Pawan Kumar Yadav, which is his WP:COMMONNAME; that title is currently blacklisted due to sockpuppetry from many years ago, but seems fien for use now. Curbon7 (talk) 09:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleaned up the article, should look much better now. Curbon7 (talk) 09:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move. Passes WP:NPOL. --Enos733 (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.