Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Bělíček

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Bělíček[edit]

Pavel Bělíček (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of a professor who, while prolific, doesn't seem to meet the notability requirements of WP:PROF. Good faith search for independent, reliable sources showing notability are coming up empty -- there are a large number of sources that originate with the subject, but not finding independent ones.

Taking to AfD instead of prod or speedy because sources showing notability are probably not in English and I might be missing something here. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have left an inquiry at the Czech Wikipedia village pump. The same person appears to be responsible for the creation of both pages, so the same resolution is likely needed in both language Wikipedias. bd2412 T 21:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He published lot of books in his publishing company, just few books outside with almost zero feedback. I went through first 100 links in Czech Google but have not found anything like significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Jklamo (talk) 01:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Exactly two citations on Scholar, and an h-index of 1. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.