Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paut Neteru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJ^Talk 01:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paut Neteru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not certain if this falls into Dicdef category. It doesn't strike me as being encyclopedic. What are your thoughts? Ecoleetage (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Have to agree with you. Unencyclopedic. Sam ^Blab 23:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: (Stereotypical response) Google comes back with sources and many written sources. Rgood erm ote 23:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - It is dicdef. Move to wiktionary with references. Chaldor (talk) 23:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as dictdef. Sources exist, but give no more info, and seem all to be tied to the one author. Merge where?: It is a foreign term for something we don't have an article. Manna maybe = bread of the gods?Yobmod (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not a dictionary definition - only the first few words of the article are about the phrase and the rest is about the concept, which is from Egyptian Book of the Dead. The trouble with this article is that not a word of it agrees with the sources I can find such as [1][2][3][4] which all refer to Paut Neteru as being a company of nine gods. As it stands the article seems to be about a fringe interpretation of the subject without even mentioning the mainstream interpretation. Unless someone with more knowledge of the subject than I have can rewrite this then it should go. I've notified the Ancient Egypt wikiproject to see if they can help - it's a pity nobody thought to do that earlier. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.