Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo J. Mendes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Paulo J. Mendes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Award nomination is not for him and is not major. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. Exposed vocals is a pay for play promotion platform. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The search tools turn up no dedicated entries from reliable sources, only Mr Mendes website. No info from reliable sources, let alone dedicated entries = no notability = delete. Tapered (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.