Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Scanlon (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Scanlon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Scanlon was in 2008, the article refers to things in 2012 so G4 deletion does not apply, and I'm replacing the speedy deletion process with an AFD. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It was previously deleted by a deletion discussion in 2008. None of the sources included as references in the new version of the article are reliable sources (Wikipedia itself, blogs or pages that list his books are not RS) and a basic search does not reveal enough coverage to meet our general notability guidelines. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.