Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rowley (broadcaster)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 02:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Rowley (broadcaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography that contains inadequate evidence of notability. (If independent evidence of notability can be supplied other than by the author, I am of course willing to keep.) Robert McClenon (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Television & Radio. Independent Broadcasting Authority. 1986.
  2. ^ "Press Gazette's top 50 political reporters".
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 05:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 05:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 05:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There are a few refs in the article but nothing that indicates he's notable. A recently created article which won't go anywhere because his career is in its twilight or ended. Szzuk (talk) 16:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.