Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Reeve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Reeve

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical, unsourced, and appears to fail WP:NMUSIC. – Ploni (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ploni (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A bad article, a relic of Wikipedia's worst years. It is embarrassing that we still have articles like this languishing here. The sort of music he has worked on may have an establishment status now it could not have dreamt of in John Major's day, but that does not mean we need to privilege every single minor functionary within it over people in less establishment-accepted genres. RobinCarmody (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That an article this down right not meeting any inclusion criteria has lasted since 2006 is a true indictment that something is wrong with Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article doesn't meet WP:GNG. Unsourced also. Ranjith207 (talk) 07:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.