Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jaworski (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 01:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Jaworski

Pay attention, now: this was originally an apparent vanity bio, speedy deleted as such, reposted speedied again, then worked up to a different bio, during the time Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jaworski was happening; speedied almost immediately, then speedied again as repost by Stifle, then recreated (possibly due to an open edit session during the deletion) and speedied again by me, leaving the poor editor somewhat befuddled. For the record, this is not the same as the original subject speedied as nn-bio. Due to potential confusions, and at the request of the (genuine) editor working on the current subject, I have reinstated it, and am bringing it here to clarify once and for all whether the current subject qualifies under WP:BIO. For the record, if I did not think this was a likely keep I would probably not have bothered, but what do I know? - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep OK, lol. This is one of my strongest keeps. Firstly, the subject took part in the first armored car robbery. There’s a nice article by the Detroit News about him: The Great Detroit News Payroll Robbery. give it a read it’s quite interesting. Secondly, he’s featured in several books such as: The Violent Years: Prohibition and the Detroit Mobs. Englishrose 16:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I must admit I know little about this but if the article is about a notable person who happens to have the same name as a previously deleted one then I think it's fair to hold on to it. Keresaspa 17:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep this is a no-brainer. DES ^(talk) 17:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable as a first. Validated: three web references, 1 book reference. --Salix alba (talk) 17:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --NaconKantari 21:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I did not speedily delete the page as I am not an administrator, merely tagged it as db-repost. I guess whoever deleted it may not have checked the old version. I'm too confused to make a vote here. See the deletion log. Stifle 00:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See? I told you I was confused :-) Sorry and all, no slur intended, I just wanted to get it undeleted ASAP so poor Englishrose could get back to work. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 15:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think I see what happened
1. 00:13, 17 January 2006 - Article with obvious fake content deleted
2. 00:22, 17 January 2006 - Article recreated with first line of real content.
3. lots more deletions, speadies tag adding and removal, etc. Meanwhile article steadly improves.--Salix alba (talk) 00:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There was never any fake content. The original article was deleted, because the person was not considered "notable" by wikipedia standards. Paulwithap 05:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep First armored car robbery, gang leader, etc. Def. notable. B.ellis 13:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have it now. Keep the page, and BJAODN this AFD page. Stifle 00:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.