Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Helmke
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. Editor has been blocked for disruptive editing over AfD nominations. (non-admin closure) Mkdwtalk 18:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Paul Helmke[edit]
- Paul Helmke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable person, poorly sourced article, primary sources, fails WP:GNG IronKnuckle (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Senra (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep: Notable person, bullshit nomination.--Milowent • hasspoken 17:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain... IronKnuckle (talk) 17:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as he appears in multiple reliable sources as seen in the article. Milowent, please calm down a few notches and just give a level-headed rationale based on policy. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Subject was Mayor of one of the largest cities in Indiana, and is discussed in multiple Reliable Sources - and, indeed, those sources were in the article at the time of its nomination. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.