Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Hale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Hale[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Most (all?) of the references are about things he worked on as opposed to being about him (so are passing mentions and not WP:SIGCOV). - UtherSRG (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Engineering, and United Kingdom. UtherSRG (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looked at this, this morning and again just now. I can't see how he is notable. There is no real coverage on him. I can't see how he can notable. When a did a WP:BEFORE on him this morning, there was nothing of note. Many of the reference of the article are dead links. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 10:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.