Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul H. Crane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul H. Crane

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a non-notable doctor who has delivered some reality television star's babies. The sources are not RS and do not establish notability. The Los Angeles Redident's guide is a business listing. IMDB is, well, IMDB. The Hollywood Reporter is the closest thing to covering the subject in depth. Kids in the House is a site for learning about pregnancy. The LA Magazine article is misnamed and isn't about him; it's about pregnancy and quotes him from an author who has a vested interest (which they disclose). The Ricki Lake source is one line. Sources 8-11 are about other people's babies. 12 and 13 are regional, non-notable awards. This amounts to a whole lot of nothing. Kbabej (talk) 03:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 03:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Kablammo (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless revisions are made. Some of the sources come up as unable to be found [1] and Doulas Association of Souther California Lifetime Achievement Award. However some resources are supported by tertiary WP:PSTS and WP:ORIGINAL such as [2] but do not believe these claims behold WP:GNG . Bioforce12 (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being an ob/gyn with notable clients does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.