Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gerard Kennedy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Sarah 15:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Paul Gerard Kennedy[edit]
- Paul Gerard Kennedy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article about a Dr. Who fan. The assertion for notability is that he is an important figure in Australian Dr. Who fandom and has won Double Gammas which are awards for excellence in Australian Dr. Who fandom. There is no significat coverage in reliable sources, and the award is not a major award. There is some claim for sources at Talk:Paul Gerard Kennedy but they are unconvincing. Whpq (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The "sources" are extremely brief mentions in a couple of National Library data entries, and a couple of fansites. So fails WP:BIO. Besides that, the article also appears to be an autobiography, and the significant contributor (and asserter of notability) the subject.. Frickeg (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. WWGB (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no independent reliable sources. The only "citation" on this article is in fact a wikilink to the Double Gammas, a fan club, which also has no reliable sources (the Australian Science Fiction Bullsheet (groan) might come close if the link weren't dead, but I still doubt it). I'd say delete both of them.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 09:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also note the COI of the main contributor, User:Chewy6202. The article subject's nickname is apparently Chewy.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.