Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Enenche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No "keep" rationale has been forthcoming. Sandstein 20:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Enenche[edit]

Paul Enenche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please see the history for evidence of POV and possible COI editing; the dozen Amazon spam links are evidence enough. Subject is a run of the mill pastor, and nothing here proves he passes the GNG. Drmies (talk) 00:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- There is nothing in the article to show that the church is more than a run-of-the-mill one. We cannot allow an article on a pastor who has done nothing but found a church, when there is no evidence that the church is also notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The pastor/founder of the largest Pentecostal [List of the largest evangelical church auditoriums|church auditorium] in the world does not seem to me like a "run-of-the-mill one". HandsomeBoy (talk) 08:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.