Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul E. Kerry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul E. Kerry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paul Kerry, the subject of the article, has requested via email that it be proposed for deletion (the actual request was sent directly to my personal email, but OTRS responders can view the conversation leading up to his decision here). Notability in this case appears fairly borderline, and in such situations the community has generally honoured requests like this; I am therefore putting this article up for deletion on his behalf. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per request, WP:N, WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The FRHistS is a sign of notability but not enough of one that we must keep the article against the subject's wishes. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tony. p b p 14:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and per TTT's reasons. --I am One of Many (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.