Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Donnelly (Scottish footballer)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Donnelly (Scottish footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 12:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No FPL or intl apps. Fenix down (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As player and now coach in a team in the third tier of Austrlian soccer (in a country where this is not a major game), I do not think he qualifies as notable enough to have an article. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.