Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Castran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 10:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Castran[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy article about a non-notable Australian who sells real estate. Has won a local award for selling real estate, which falls far below what's required for notability. He also has a brother who didn't die in a skiing accident and a wife who sells jewellery. The only realistic claim of notability is that he once said he was going to sue Google but then thought better of it. Fails WP:BIO among other things. andy (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing here to indicate notability or suitability for inclusion in an encyclopedia.--Michig (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or even CSD it again - it's a blatant recreation of a CSD A7: 22:32, 23 September 2010 Alexf (talk | contribs) deleted "Paul Castran" ‎ (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) - I patrolled and nominated it.--Kudpung (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete overly promotional, and probably WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete preferably speedily. Wile E. Heresiarch (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.