Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattern Insight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | comment _ 22:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pattern Insight[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

5-year-old notability tag; lets decide one way or another CorporateM (Talk) 00:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment - Recently the company gained media coverage on TechCrunch (see [1]); it seems that WMvare has acquired platform Log Insight from Pattern Insight. According to Spiros Xandros's home page (see [2], he is/was the CEO of Pattern Insight), the entire company Pattern Insight has been acquired by VMware and not only the platform Log Insight. Maybe merging the useful and relevant material into VMware is a preferable alternative to AfD. Toffanin (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no significant coverage from multiple non-primary reliable sources where the subject is the primary subject of the source to indicate subject is notable per WP:GNG and/or WP:CORP. There are a couple brief mentions, but if taken all together the sum of those mentions do not add up to be significant coverage IMHO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The firm produces data mining software for source code and log data. The article makes no case for significant impact on technology, history, or culture. Google News finds only press releases and routine business notices. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.