Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrizia Polliotto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Coolperson177 (talk) 01:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patrizia Polliotto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO this is WP:ADMASQ. I was almost fooled by "In August 2021, Forbes named Patrizia Polliotto among the top four women who have brought prestige to the world of corporate responsibility in Italy" but WP:FORBESCON applies. Also WP:NOTLINKEDIN Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The corresponding article in the Italian Wikipedia has been deleted, twice. Even so, the references seem to add up to something. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Patrizia's profile, she's an influencial person in Italy, I'm requesting that the article not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddyug (talk • contribs) 01:02, September 9, 2021 (UTC)
Keep: While many of the refs are to primary sources, there are a few secondary sources which confirm notability.--Ipigott (talk) 10:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ipigott which sources do you think confirm notability? It would be helpful to the rest of us so we don't have to weed through a ton of refs to find them. Thanks.4meter4 (talk) 04:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a start [1] and [2]. There are frequently news items about her in the Italian press such as this, just a week ago. On this basis, she certainly seems to meet notability requirements.--Ipigott (talk) 06:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She has some sources that show notability, she is more searchable than alot of articles on wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.185.141.212 (talk) 13:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. There does appear to be WP:SUSTAINED coverage in the Italian press. Passes WP:GNG, just barely. Article does need to be trimmed for puffery, but WP:AFD is not cleanup.4meter4 (talk) 20:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.