Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Wee Ewe Seng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Wee Ewe Seng[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

person of questionable notability, only referencing in article makes no mention of subject WuhWuzDat 06:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following related page has also been listed for deletion:

Delete. I declined the speedy on this because I felt the claim of a business award might just indicate notability. However the claim is not sourced and I could not myself find any confirmation. This article was originally longer with a lot of questionable material which I removed per WP:BLP and seems to be part of a SPA campaign by its originator. Other editors may feel the claimed award is not sufficient, but unless it can be confirmed the point is moot. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 07:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Any award for "most promising" is doubtful as the basis of a claim of notability as by definition the person has not "made it" yet. Being a CEO or company founder is equally poor as a rationale for notability. Fæ (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article has been created, deleted, and recreated under other names and then deleted again via CSD. None of the articles have indicated importance or presented notability through significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cind.amuse 16:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.